image missing
HOME SN-BRIEFS SYSTEM
OVERVIEW
EFFECTIVE
MANAGEMENT
PROGRESS
PERFORMANCE
PROBLEMS
POSSIBILITIES
STATE
CAPITALS
FLOW
ACTIVITIES
FLOW
ACTORS
PETER
BURGESS
SiteNav SitNav (0) SitNav (1) SitNav (2) SitNav (3) SitNav (4) SitNav (5) SitNav (6) SitNav (7) SitNav (8)
Date: 2024-09-27 Page is: DBtxt001.php txt00022081
US POLITICS
SUPREME COURT NOMINATION PROCESS

NYT Opinion ... Oh, Josh & Marsha & Ted & Lindsey … Sorry, Judge Jackson ... an appalling spectacle


Credit...T.J. Kirkpatrick for The New York Times

Original article: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/07/opinion/jackson-cruz-scotus.html
Burgess COMMENTARY
Some of the people who have been elected to Congress ... the Senate and the House of Representatives ... and super very competent people. However too many who get elected are simply awful. The one thing they know how to do is to get elected, and how to jam up the legislative system.
This problem is not new, but it has become chronic in recent years.
Several of the GOP Senators involved with the confirmation hearings for Ketanji Brown Jackson to the Supreme Court would have been entertaining if the work was not so important. Frankly, I find the GOP politicans embarrassing ... and incentivises mew to do all i can to make sure they lose their seasts.
Peter Burgess
Oh, Josh & Marsha & Ted & Lindsey … Sorry, Judge Jackson

Written by Michelle Cottle ... Ms. Cottle is a member of the NYT editorial board.

April 7, 2022

Although contentious — at times moronically so — the overall process to confirm Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to the Supreme Court was relatively efficient, and the nomination was never in serious jeopardy. The final vote even wound up vaguely bipartisan, with three Republicans joining Democrats in supporting her.

But these high court confirmations also double as prime opportunities for members of the Senate Judiciary Committee — especially those harboring presidential aspirations — to strut their stuff for a larger-than-usual audience. When the nominee is mired in scandal or controversy, this dynamic can result in tense, illuminating exchanges. (Am I right, Justices Kavanaugh and Thomas?) But there wasn’t that kind of grist with Judge Jackson, so Republicans went with misrepresenting her positions and blathering on about unrelated culture war controversies. Classic, if utterly predictable choices.

Top showboaters this time around included Ted Cruz, Tom Cotton, Marsha Blackburn, Josh Hawley and Lindsey Graham — a master of the self-righteous hissy fit. These folks really went the extra mile to turn the proceedings into a circus. So much performative outrage. So little interest in reality.

Surprising no one, Mr. Cruz was the most embarrassing of the lot. In a convoluted effort to paint Judge Jackson as a radical wokester (the asinine details of which are but an online search away for those interested), the senator whipped out a copy of the picture book “Antiracist Baby” and started tossing off bizarre, misleading questions such as, “Do you agree with this book that is being taught with kids that babies are racist?” (The book doesn’t teach that.)

Perhaps Mr. Cruz was feeling nostalgic for his freshman year in the chamber, when he gave a dramatic reading on the Senate floor of another kiddie book — Dr. Seuss’s “Green Eggs and Ham” — as part of a marathon speech protesting the Affordable Care Act. That speech is often mischaracterized as a filibuster. But a vote on the legislation had already been scheduled, meaning that nothing Mr. Cruz said, read or yodeled made a lick of difference. He was simply delivering an empty, blustery performance with an eye toward convincing his party’s voters of his fighting chops.

Cruz and Co. played the same cynical game with Judge Jackson. They knew they didn’t really have the juice to derail her confirmation. (Two cheers for Mitch McConnell for having killed the filibuster for Supreme Court picks?) They were just strutting and posturing and channeling Trumpian jerkiness to fire up the base: Check us out! Aren’t we fierce and naughty?!

Happily, the clown show failed to disrupt the proceedings. This is in part a tribute to Judge Jackson’s ability to remain chill in the face of even the most off-point questions. (What is her definition of a woman? Really?) It also helped that the finger waggers and foot stompers were so transparently self-serving that even their teammates recognized it. At one point, Ben Sasse felt moved to refer to “the jackassery we often see around here” with folks “mugging” for the cameras.

That said, the performers’ shamelessness was impressive. After a testy exchange with the Democratic chairman of the committee, Mr. Cruz kicked back and lost himself in his Twitter feed. Nearby reporters noted that he appeared to be checking his mentions to see how he was playing on social media. Now there’s a guy who takes his constitutional duties seriously.

But for Mr. Cruz, who labors under the delusion that he will one day be elected president, it doesn’t matter much whether he wins or loses a particular fight or gets perpetually derided for being a self-absorbed goofball with baffling facial hair. It’s all about preening for the base.

Mr. Cruz, to be fair, is hardly alone in this attitude. Even as Judge Jackson takes her hard-earned victory lap, her Senate antagonists will be congratulating themselves on all the MAGA love they surely earned. Perhaps they yearn for shout-outs along the lines of:
  • Thank you, @tedcruz, for exposing the antiracist baby scourge. Biggest story since Pizzagate.
  • Stand tall, @MarshaBlackburn. You are the definition of a REAL WOMAN. #BigHair4Eva
  • Don’t feel bad, @LindseyGrahamSC. I often confuse Ketanji Brown Jackson with Janice Rogers Brown as well. #HonestMistake.
  • Hey, @SenTomCotton, I hear George Soros is a closet furry. Time for hearings? #AllDemsAreGroomers
And, of course:
  • You are a warrior and patriot, @tedcruz, but for the love of god get a decent shave.
You get the basic point. For those who brayed most loudly against Judge Jackson’s nomination, there are plenty of rewards to reap. In today’s MAGAfied G.O.P., nothing thrills quite so much as flamboyant jackassery.
------------------------------
Editors’ Picks
  • Janelle James Loves Being a Bad Boss in ‘Abbott Elementary’
  • A Wooden Knife Sharper Than Steel? Scientists Say So.
  • Descending Into Florida’s Underwater Caves




The text being discussed is available at
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/07/opinion/jackson-cruz-scotus.html
and
SITE COUNT<
Amazing and shiny stats
Blog Counters Reset to zero January 20, 2015
TrueValueMetrics (TVM) is an Open Source / Open Knowledge initiative. It has been funded by family and friends. TVM is a 'big idea' that has the potential to be a game changer. The goal is for it to remain an open access initiative.
WE WANT TO MAINTAIN AN OPEN KNOWLEDGE MODEL
A MODEST DONATION WILL HELP MAKE THAT HAPPEN
The information on this website may only be used for socio-enviro-economic performance analysis, education and limited low profit purposes
Copyright © 2005-2021 Peter Burgess. All rights reserved.