Essentially ... nobody
Does anyone really care about failure in the relief and development sector?
The quick answer seems to be that nobody cares. Certainly not the rich and
powerful. If they did, then the situation would have never got to this state in
the first place, and it would have been fixed long ago.
The failure of relief and development is obscene. But mostly its impact is far
away from the people who are comfortably off, and are able to live the good
life.
Ordinary people do not want homelessness in their neighborhood, but
homelessness that one never sees is not a problem ... at any rate, it is
someone else's problem.
And organizations involved in relief and development seem to be comfortable
with the disastrous status quo. For the staff there is job security as long as
there is funding to respond to disaster.
Except the poor
Maybe the poor do care, but what can they do about it. As a practical matter,
the poor have little access to any of the tools or resources that they need to
climb out of their poverty. They do not have a voice, and even if they did,
would anyone listen?
Worse, the poor have stopped talking. There is a level of hopelessness that is
numbing. The poor get by, but they have given up. Nobody is in their corner
... nobody in their local government and nobody in the international
community.
Maybe it would be smart to care
Whether the rich and powerful like it or not, the technology and the
techniques that enabled their own wealth is going to make it possible for
others to start a climb towards a more affluent life.
In the 1960s a barrel of oil was just $3.50. In 1973 OPEC was able to create a
cartel of petroleum exporting countries and move the price to $13.50 a
barrel. The balance of global power changed in a dramatic manner. Perhaps it
was the biggest single economic event in all of history, and it might have been
the end of wealth creation in the old money centers of the world (London,
New York, Paris, Frankfurt, etc). As it turned out, it was not. The OPEC
countries were co-opted into the money center system and a crisis for the
“north” was averted ... at any rate for some decades.
An emerging community of anti-north activists
Young people are learning all over the world. People in the “south” are not
only learning what we in the “north” want them to learn, but have learned
how to learn for themselves, how to analyze and draw their own conclusions.
Many are figuring out that the world is not the way it should be. It takes a lot
of explaining why some places and people are so wealthy while others are in
abject poverty ... how some groups are so rich, and some are so poor.
The rationale that “the poor have always been with us” is not a very useful
argument when trying to explain why someone is poor, has no job, has
hungry sick children, and has no reason for hope.
What a community of anti-north activists will become is worth thinking
about. Maybe it explains why increasingly people hate countries like the USA
are want to do anything to inflict hurt.
And worse
It is reasonable to argue that it is a rather small additional step for anti-north
activism to morph into anti-north terrorism. All too often the face of the
“north” presented in the “south” is very negative, especially the “north” as
represented by government and its official policies ... and so much of what is
being done seems to be simply in the interest of the “north” and nobody else.
By early in 2006, the price of a barrel of oil passed $70.00 a barrel making
huge profits for every oil producing nation and the oil companies. Rich people
can handle the increased cost of gas (petrol), but for poor people it is a
problem. The crude oil price increases of the 1970s was handled ... but it is
less clear that the price increases 30 odd years later are going to be as easily
handled.
The old “north” needs to pay attention. The global fund flows are not the
same any more, and North America and Europe (and Japan) are a lot more
fragile than is safe. This will certainly be exploited when the “anti-north” is
good and ready. The “north” would be well advised to think through what it is
that they can do that would be helpful.
Maybe it is too late ... but maybe there is time to make some changes.
Also a “north” community of advocates for reform
There has been a small community of advocates for reform for many years.
There has been a steady stream of critiques of development, and a lot of
advocacy for change going back as long as I have been interacting with the
relief and development sector. In the late 1980s books like Hanson's “Lords of
Poverty”, and in the 1990s books like Catherine Caufield's “Masters of
Illusion” posed important questions and documented problems taking aim
mainly at the World Bank.
I sense that there is a broader base now than in years past. The relief and
development sector was less mature twenty years ago and the organizations
could more easily argue “give us more time”. A number of authors have
started to write about aspects of the relief and development sector that were
previously off limits. John Perkins has written “Confessions of an Economic
Hit Man”, James Henry has written “Blood Bankers” and Bill Easterly has
written “The White Man's Burden”. These books challenge the status quo and
pose questions that need some serious answers.
These authors and others are starting to suggest that failure of the relief and
development sector has been orchestrated by agents for the rich and
powerful, and that this failure has been of inestimable benefit for the
incumbent wealthy. They are suggesting that poverty and failure makes it
possible for the rich and powerful to remain rich and powerful and then
become even richer and more powerful.
Will this be different from ten or twenty years ago? Maybe ... maybe not.
We can be confident that there will be a lot of talk, but whether or not there
will be anything more than talk is not yet clear.
|