Adam Smith wrote about markets in his famous book 'The Wealth of Nations' published in 1776, almost 250 years ago. He talked about many things, but most people remember the idea of 'the invisible hand' of the market that helps to optimize the economy so that there is the best allocation of resources.
This idea has worked better than, for example, the communist system of state control of the economy.
In my view the old communist bloc of the cold war had two separate issues: (1) the economic idea that there should be state control of the economy; and (2) the concept of totalitarian control of the individual by the state. Both were bad ideas, but for me, it is helpful to separate the two issues.
The market system described by Adam Smith still works very well, but most modern markets especially those in the developed countries are very different. When Adam Smith did his study most economic activity was done in very small entities, and there were many participants in the market place. In contrast, today a huge amount of the economy is controlled by just a few producers, just a few wholesalers, and just a few retail outlets. In developed countries the consumer is expected to pay the price that has been determined by the retailer and the opportunity to 'haggle' over the price has been almost completely removed. The so-called market is no longer something where ordinary people engage in a market negotiation but something entirely different where large oligopolistic organizations control the outcomes.
The market mechanism has been called into play to help define what “price” should be ... but it really
does not work very well. And when it is decided that the government can administer price better than the
market, the results are usually horrendous. Examples abound:
Staff costs in the relief and development sector
Staff costs are important ... and especially the huge difference between the
remuneration paid to local staff and remuneration paid to international staff. This
subject has not been much discussed though it is very important in the design and
cost effectiveness of almost every development intervention.
Frankly ... this subject has been kept off the table for at least the last three decades
because it is key to most development experts' career planning ... and many who
aspire to this group. But it is too important a matter not to get it addressed.
Powdered milk – impact of subsidy
I tried to organize the supply of powdered milk for a West African importer ... and
what I expected to be relatively easy was a nightmare. The cost of milk is very
variable depending on how much subsidy the farmer has negotiated and where the
cows are located. Both the European Union and the United States have highly
subsidized cows. Of course the ex-farm price of milk becomes a component of the
cost of powdered milk ... but then there are programs that encourage export of
agricultural products including powdered milk, and these programs are further
subsidies. With the maximum of subsidy the price of powdered milk turned out to be
about $1,050 per MT in Europe and $1,100 per MT in the United States ... and by the
time shipping and insurance were factored in the cif cost was going to be somewhat
lower from Europe than the United States.
But then it appeared that there were quantity questions ... and if the quota was
exceeded and all the subsidy used, then the prices would not be $1,050 and $1,100
respectively but more like $2,050 and $2,100. At the lower price, the price being paid
by our West African importer would have generated a modest trading profit ... at the
higher price, a considerable loss. And then it started to appear that the problem of the
missing subsidy on the supply side would go away if we ordered immediately with
some premium to be negotiated. In other words everything had a price.
Meanwhile, our customer in Africa was relatively new to this business ... and the
established importers did not want new competition. Suddenly his bank needed all
sorts of additional information, and it became pretty clear that there was what
amounted to an import cartel that also had influence in the bank.
Lesson ... while the market may be powerful as a theoretical construct, it is puny
relative to the many different centers of economic power that control and profit from
the status quo. The incentives that really matter ... the profits in the value chain are
complex and usually driven by some important private relationships.
Tea auction – Malawi
The conventional wisdom is that I
Cashew – farmgate prices in Kerala
I
Controlled prices for everything – Guinea Bissau
I
Coffee auction - Burundi
I
Exchange control distortion – Nigeria
I
Price projections – World Bank getting it wrong
I
TVM Value Accountancy identifies some of these and helps get them addressed.
TVM Value Accountancy aims to put data about community economics into a balance sheet ... and see
what are the constraining factors ... and how they can be removed so that the community progresses.
|