The Conversation ... United States Aviation ... In an iconic airport terminal, the last vestiges of a bygone era
A TWA annual report from the early 1960s featured its gleaming new terminal. Todd Lappin/flickr, CC BY-NC
“Come fly with me,” Frank Sinatra encouraged his listeners in the hit title song of his 1958 album. “Let’s take off in the blue.” “Once I get you up there,” he crooned, “where the air is rarefied, we’ll just glide.”
Such an optimistic view of air travel could have only been imagined at mid-century. And it was with similar buoyancy that the Finnish-American architect Eero Saarinen (perhaps best-known for St. Louis’ Gateway Arch), designed the epic TWA terminal at New York City’s John F Kennedy Airport, then known as Idlewild Airport.
Now, after sitting unused for nearly 15 years, the building is slated to be transformed into a new hotel proposed by JetBlue and MCR Development LLC.
In a way, the iconic terminal’s rise, fall and planned repurposing have mirrored the ways air travel has changed over the past 50 years.
A symbol of a bygone era
As a renowned flagship carrier, the terminal’s sponsor – TWA – contributed to the excitement of the structure. Known as the “Airline to the Stars” for its popularity among Hollywood celebrities and executives, the airline would introduce its Jetstream aircraft on NBC’s Steve Allen Show in 1957 to more than half of the nation’s television viewers.
The 1950s were the golden age of air travel, and business was booming for TWA, which commissioned Saarinen’s terminal. James Vaughan/Flickr, CC BY-NC-SA
In conceiving the structure, Saarinen envisioned a terminal for a more civilized form of air travel, a building that represented an heroic conception of flight itself, one that – as he put it – expressed “the drama and specialness and excitement of travel.”
The concept for the terminal, Saarinen explained, was relatively simple, consisting “essentially of four interacting barrel vaults of slightly different shapes, supported on four Y-shaped columns.”
These vaults combined to produce a concrete shell more than 300 feet long that seemed to float, 50 feet above passengers’ heads. Curving walls, expansive windows overlooking the runways and tubular passages contributed to an overall effect that was both futuristic and organic.
It was purely coincidental, Saarinen claimed, that the TWA terminal reminded some viewers of a bird in flight.
The curving walls of the TWA terminal. Gabriel Jorby/flickr, CC BY-ND
The building was completed in 1962 amid a boom in air travel – when flying was becoming easier and more accessible to ever-larger numbers.
As William C Goodman, an economist with the Bureau of Labor Statistics, has observed, the cost of airline tickets, adjusted for inflation, began to fall in 1950 or earlier, and continued to do so for decades. In turn, the number of passenger miles logged by Americans soared.
No wonder Sinatra could entrance his listeners with the romantic prospects of flying trips to exotic destinations.
Visually impressive, functionally flawed
The building quickly assumed canonical status in the history of modern architecture.
However, Saarinen’s modernist monument was more renowned for its design than it was for its ability to function as an airport terminal. New airplanes proved too large for the two “departure stations.”
Even upon its completion in 1962, critic Allan Temko declared the TWA terminal to be “functionally and symbolically…out-of-date, made obsolete, in truth, by Saarinen’s own consummate masterpiece: the jet-age airport for Washington,” at Dulles. Seven years later, a new concourse needed to be added to accommodate the Boeing 747.
Its functional shortcomings notwithstanding, the TWA terminal was enjoyed as a “baroque” or “expressionistic” space in which curving staircases, walkways and ramps created drama, elevating the experience of travel.
Tubular passageways gave the terminal a futuristic feel. Wally Gobetz/flickr, CC BY-NC-ND
The TWA terminal received landmark status in 1994, although it had already begun decaying. In 2001, when TWA went bankrupt, the terminal finally closed.
Renovation a response to economic – not cultural – forces
Paradoxically, the virtual abandonment of the TWA terminal coincided with the increasing popularity of mid-century modernism in architecture and furnishings. For instance, architect Philip Johnson’s mid-century modernist masterpiece, the Glass House in New Canaan, Connecticut, opened to great acclaim and popularity in 2007.
Recognizing the TWA terminal’s modern architectural significance, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey – the building’s owners – commissioned a restoration estimated at US$20 million in 2008.
While pop culture phenomena like “Mad Men” – the TV series behind the revival of the skinny suit, teak credenza and three-martini lunch – may have contributed to a renewed esteem for the TWA terminal, the planned conversion is more about economics.
In its coverage of the project, the Wall Street Journal noted the increasing popularity – and profitability – of airport hotels. Given the difficulty and expense of getting from outlying airports to central cities, many business travelers now prefer to hold meetings and spend their nights near where they land and take off.
The TWA terminal has sat abandoned since 2001. Acroterion/Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA
Today, Sinatra’s song – and the now-vacant terminal – are vestiges of an antiquated view of air travel. Gone are the stewardesses in white gloves and the smoking sections. And with post-9/11 security paranoia, getting to the gate can take longer than the airplane ride itself.
In a way, the forthcoming “terminal-hotel” represents what travel, for many, has become: a way of conducting business and a part of the workaday world.
And Saarinen’s grand aspirations for infusing travel with “excitement” seems as out-of-date as the optimistic national mood from which his project emerged.
==========================================================================
Architecture
flying
Air travel
1960s
Airports
Tweet Share Get newsletter
You might also like
A second Sydney airport? Not anytime soon
Sydney needs a second airport: it’s as simple (and as complicated) as that
Is this the end of the road for business travel?
Why Heathrow’s hopeless flight plan will struggle to take off
Sign in to comment4 Comments
Oldest Newest
John Doyle
Eero Saarinen 's concept here had its apogee with the Sydney Opera House. Saarinen was the juror who pushed for the Utzon design in late 1956. so in a way these two masterpieces share their genes.
I am not afraid to say so but The Sydney Opera House, partly because of it prominent position on Sydney harbour foreshore, will come to be regarded generally as the most iconic building of the entire 20Th Century!
And we can thank Eero Saarinen for his part in its achievement.
2 years ago
Report
Philip Ashbourn
In reply to John Doyle
I am always pleased I made a special effort in 1963 to travel out from NYC to Idlewild to photograph the iconic TWA terminal. In those days air travel was the way to go for most Americans, leaving the railroads to fight a losing battle to retain custom. Many trains I traveled on in this period were very run down and it was no great surprise when passenger traffic was abandoned by the railroads only to be subsequently rescued in part by Amtrak.
Good luck to this initiative. Finding new uses for old buildings is one of the challenges of the age.
2 years ago
Report
Show all comments
Most popular on The Conversation
Stretching your donation dollars: 5 tips
How do fire ants form giant rafts to survive floods?
Americans who live far from coasts should also be worried about flooding
How should we protest neo-Nazis? Lessons from German history
When ‘man’s best friend’ feels more hate than love for an owner
I was an Exxon-funded climate scientist
What made the rain in Hurricane Harvey so extreme?
How quantum mechanics can change computing
Here’s a better vision for the US-Mexico border: Make the Rio Grande grand again
Postpartum depression can affect dads – and their hormones may be to blame
Expert Database
Find experts with knowledge in:*
e.g. Cyber Security
Search
Want to write?
Write an article and join a growing community of more than 55,100 academics and researchers from 2,131 institutions.
Register now
The Conversation
Community
Community standards
Republishing guidelines
Friends of The Conversation
Research and Expert Database
Analytics
Our feeds
Donate
Company
Who we are
Our charter
Our team
Partners and funders
Contributing institutions
Resource for media
Contact us
Stay informed
Subscribe to our Newsletters
Your email address
Subscribe
Follow us on social media
Privacy policy Terms and conditions Corrections Copyright © 2010–2017, The Conversation US, Inc.
Author
Kevin D. Murphy
Andrew W Mellon Chair in the Humanities and Professor and Chair of History of Art, Vanderbilt University
Disclosure statement
Kevin D Murphy is a member of the Society of Architectural Historians and the College Art Association.
Partners
Vanderbilt University
Vanderbilt University provides funding as a founding partner of The Conversation US.
View all partners
Republish this article
Republish Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under Creative Commons license.
| |