Climate Change / Media
Important news -v- profit

Is climate change a “ratings killer,” or is something wrong with for-profit media?

Burgess COMMENTARY

Peter Burgess

Slaven Vlasic / Getty Images THE WEAKEST LINK Is climate change a “ratings killer,” or is something wrong with for-profit media? Share Tweet MSNBC anchor Chris Hayes retweeted Grist writer Eric Holthaus’ tweet about the deadly wildfires in Greece on Tuesday. After freelance writer Elon Green commented that news networks often fail to highlight the connection between climate change and extreme weather, Hayes wrote a reply that sent Twitter into a frenzy. Climate change, he said, is a “palpable ratings killer” for news shows. Stagger Lee Shot First ✔ @elongreen · 24 Jul Replying to @chrislhayes Sure would be nice if our news networks--the only outlets that can force change in this country--would cover it with commensurate urgency. Acting as if there's nothing to be done is not excusable. Chris Hayes ✔ @chrislhayes almost without exception. every single time we've covered it's been a palpable ratings killer. so the incentives are not great. 10:08 AM - Jul 24, 2018 515 521 people are talking about this Twitter Ads info and privacy Environmental journalists came out in full force to set him straight. The reason that newsrooms are failing to bring up climate change has a lot to do with the way major news outlets are structured (profits first, content second), they said, and less to do with people’s interest in climate change. Hayes has a pretty good track record when it comes to reporting on climate, compared to his competitors across other channels. He even did an “All In with Chris Hayes” special climate series in 2016. But the point stands that the current for-profit media structure doesn’t jibe well with compelling reporting on the environment. Take Holthaus’ response, for example. Eric Holthaus ✔ @EricHolthaus My @RollingStone article was the most-shared in its history. I was a top-5 traffic earner for @slate. The problem isnt truth-tellers like @chrislhayes. It's producers/editors working against a broken for-profit journalistic model that rewards status quo.https://twitter.com/emorwee/status/1022141661789474816?s=19 … Emily Atkin ✔ @emorwee I've covered climate change for five years. Trust me: The topic itself is not a ratings/traffic killer. The traffic killer is the boring, un-engaging way many reporters tell the story. https://twitter.com/charles_kinbote/status/1022132673555386369 … 1:06 PM - Jul 25, 2018 401 137 people are talking about this Twitter Ads info and privacy Emily Atkin, staff writer at The New Republic, thinks it’s all about the way you present the piece. Emily Atkin ✔ @emorwee I've covered climate change for five years. Trust me: The topic itself is not a ratings/traffic killer. The traffic killer is the boring, un-engaging way many reporters tell the story. nuanced opinion guy @charles_kinbote I actually respect that Chris Hayes said covering climate change is a ratings killer. No offense to people dunking on him but I don’t think people understand that if you have a tv show you can’t just do whatever you want?? 11:28 AM - Jul 25, 2018 684 192 people are talking about this Twitter Ads info and privacy Erin Biba, who writes for the likes of BBC and Wired, agrees with Atkin. 💯💯👇👇 If climate change was such a ratings killer, why are people constantly clicking on my stories and reading them and thanking me for them and coming here to engage me about them? IF PEOPLE AREN'T INTERESTED IN YOUR STORIES, IT'S YOUR FAULT NOT THEIRS. https://t.co/VfFt2q3PPx — Erin Biba (@erinbiba) July 25, 2018 And Huffington Post’s Alexander Kaufman threw Hayes a bone for bringing the subject up in the first place. Alexander Kaufman ✔ @AlexCKaufman Props to Chris for this refreshingly honest admission. This dynamic underscores the vital role meteorologists play in communicating climate change to the public — and why the GOP assault on funding for the leading program to educate weathercasters on climate science is shameful. Chris Hayes ✔ @chrislhayes Replying to @elongreen almost without exception. every single time we've covered it's been a palpable ratings killer. so the incentives are not great. 6:01 PM - Jul 24, 2018 · Queens, NY 15 See Alexander Kaufman's other Tweets Twitter Ads info and privacy It’s actually pretty unusual for a cable news host to go anywhere near the topic of climate change. An analysis from Media Matters for America shows that, of 127 TV broadcast segments on NBC, CBS, and ABC about the recent heat wave, only one mentioned climate change. It’s not like sweltering temperatures caused all those hosts to develop climate amnesia. The failure to link climate change to heat waves and downpours is a trend: Those same networks all but ignored the issue in their 2017 coverage of extreme weather events, another Media Matters report found. Is 2018 the year that editors, producers, and talk show hosts finally figure out how to talk about climate change? For-profit newsrooms better start taking notes from environmental reporters soon; hurricane season is upon us once again.