image missing
Date: 2024-10-19 Page is: DBtxt003.php txt00016070

Media
Bloomberg News

Michelle Obama most popular / The perils of the Fed Chairman sitting down with the President

Burgess COMMENTARY

Peter Burgess


--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Obamas Top the Trumps as America’s Most Admired People

By Derek Wallbank

December 27, 2018, 10:35 AM EST

Play VideoPlay Unmute Current Time 0:08 / Duration Time 0:59

Michelle Obama, who’s touring the U.S. to promote her autobiography, was named the most admired woman by Americans in a Gallup poll released today. It’s the first time in 17 years that former First Lady Hillary Clinton didn’t top the list.

Gallup’s annual poll, conducted December 3-12 among 1,025 U.S. adults, asks respondents what man or woman, living today in any part of the world, they admire most.

Former President Barack Obama is the most admired man for the 11th year in a row, besting current President Donald Trump, who’s second. That’s a rare position for an incumbent president -- just 13 times out of 72 polls has the current president not won. Given the current polarized times, there was a large partisan split. Obama was the most admired man among Democrats and independents, while Republicans overwhelmingly said they preferred Trump.

Others on the top 10 list are former Presidents George W. Bush and Bill Clinton, businessmen Bill Gates and Elon Musk, independent Bernie Sanders and Democrat Joe Biden, Vice President Mike Pence, Pope Francis and the Dalai Lama.

Among women, Oprah Winfrey came second, while Clinton fell to third. First Lady Melania Trump rose to fourth place. The 10 most-admired women also included Queen Elizabeth, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Ellen DeGeneres, Nikki Haley, Malala Yousafzai and Nancy Pelosi, the once and likely future House speaker.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Economics ... Powell Has a Lot to Lose, Little to Gain in Trump Sit-Down

By Christopher Condon and Jeanna Smialek
December 28, 2018, 12:00 AM EST Updated on December 28, 2018, 11:21 AM EST
White House aides reportedly trying to set up meeting
Pause Unmute Current Time 00:04 / Duration Time 10:25 Captions Fullscreen

Fed Criticism Damages White House Credibility, Posen Says

Criticism of Fed Chairman Jerome Powell damages White House credibility, says Adam Posen of the Peterson Institute.

Of all the holiday gatherings Jerome Powell gets invited to, a sit-down in the Oval Office might be one of the last he’d want to attend.

Just days after President Donald Trump blamed the Federal Reserve chairman for the stock market’s December swoon and discussed with aides his desire to fire him, White House staff are reportedly working to set up a meeting between the two men.

While some Fed watchers said such a confab could ease tensions, most warned it might be a minefield for Powell, either creating the impression the Fed is giving in to presidential pressure, or simply generating confusion over what gets discussed.

“This is a very dangerous meeting,” said Mark Spindel, the head of Potomac River Capital, a Washington investment fund.

Coming amid a massive market sell-off and soon after a bevy of attacks on Powell from Trump, a meeting might only put the Fed in an even tougher spot, Spindel said. “Could I imagine a kiss and make up in the Rose Garden? Yes,” he said. But the president could also “offer his own read-out of what happens,” as he has after other meetings.

Donald Kohn, a former Fed vice chairman under Ben Bernanke, agreed a meeting would carry plenty of peril for Powell.

“The downside is not the meeting itself, but what happens afterwards,” said Kohn, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution in Washington. “The risk is that the president interprets what he hears and then repeats something publicly that is not entirely consistent with what the chair wanted to convey,” he said.

Read More:
Trump Said to Discuss Firing Fed’s Powell After Latest Rate Hike
Fed’s Powell Is ‘100 Percent’ Safe, Trump Adviser Hassett Says
Trump Rips Fed as Economy’s Only Problem; No Powell Mention Trump-Powell Battle Would Span Three Arenas Where Everyone Loses
Rattled Markets Would ‘Erupt’ If Trump Fired the Fed Chief

Trump Could Face Uphill Battle in Trying to Fire Fed’s Powell

With nine rate hikes in three years, the Fed is trying to balance the risks of moving too fast and squelching the U.S. expansion and moving too slowly, allowing the economy or financial markets to overheat. Trump has railed against rate hikes since July because inflation is tame. His ire hit a new level after the Fed hiked for a fourth time this year on Dec. 19, a move that further depressed an already sliding stock market.

Two days later, Bloomberg News reported that Trump had spoken with aides about firing Powell, triggering even worse pain for stocks. The S&P 500 Index fell on Dec. 24 to its lowest since April 2017. It has since rebounded slightly but remains down almost 10 percent this year and about 17 percent since Sept. 20.

That’s angered the president, who has encouraged Americans to judge his performance by the size of their retirement accounts. On Christmas Eve he continued to blame the Fed, tweeting, “the only problem our economy has is the Fed.”

Donald J. Trump ✔ @realDonaldTrump
The only problem our economy has is the Fed. They don’t have a feel for the Market, they don’t understand necessary Trade Wars or Strong Dollars or even Democrat Shutdowns over Borders. The Fed is like a powerful golfer who can’t score because he has no touch - he can’t putt!

123K 10:55 AM - Dec 24, 2018 Twitter Ads info and privacy 84.4K people are talking about this Twitter Ads info and privacy The constant pressure has forced Powell to regularly reassure markets that Fed officials operate independent of politics. That means they will neither stop raising rates at Trump’s behest nor continue hiking in order to demonstrate their independence.

Trump is “changing the debate about what monetary policy should be,” said George Washington University professor Sarah Binder. “It just raises these doubts about how insulated the Fed can be from these kinds of pressures.”

Mick MulvaneyPhotographer: Al Drago/Bloomberg

Some senior administration officials appear to understand the risks of undermining the Fed and have sought to contain the controversy. Trump’s incoming chief of staff, Mick Mulvaney, said Dec. 23 that Trump “now realizes he does not have the ability” to fire a Fed chairman. On Dec. 26, Kevin Hassett, chairman of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, told reporters that Powell was “100 percent” safe in his post.

A report that White House staff hoped to set up a Trump-Powell meeting appeared in The Wall Street Journal on Dec. 23.

Since Bill Clinton, presidents have refrained from criticizing the Fed in public and generally resisted pressuring the central bank behind the scenes. Still, meetings between a Fed chair and president were not unheard of. Alan Greenspan, Bernanke and Janet Yellen all attended such gatherings, typically to brief the president on the U.S. economic outlook, deal with a crisis or discuss their reappointment or departure.

Even in the current, rancorous circumstances, a meeting now has some potential upside for Powell.

“The opportunity for Jay is that he gets a chance to confront his chief critic and enhance the president’s understanding of why the Federal Reserve is doing what it’s doing,” Kohn said.

Hassett said “the two of them are great guys” who would get along if they were to meet and talk things through. “The president loves to listen to reason, to arguments, to analysis, and Jay does too. So I think they would have a very productive dinner were they to meet,” he told Fox Business Network on Thursday.

Some kind of rapprochement would be good for investors, according to Diana Amoa, a senior portfolio manager at JPMorgan Asset Management.

“To the extent the two can meet and reconcile this and find a way forward where we don’t look to Twitter, markets can start focusing on fundamentals again. I think that’s a positive,” she said Friday on Bloomberg Television.

Adam Posen, president of the Peterson Institute for International Economics in Washington, counseled Powell not to challenge the president, even if Trump follows the meeting with a mischaracterization of what was discussed.

“The Fed can just be factual,” he said. “It’s not their job to correct other people, it’s their job to repeat what their message is.”
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Markets
‘Completely Bizarre’ Stock Moves Leave Traders Scratching Heads
By Abhishek Vishnoi , Min Jeong Lee , and Matthew Burgess
December 27, 2018, 10:38 PM EST Updated on December 28, 2018, 5:26 AM EST
Explaining moves is ‘exercise in futility,’ investor says
Some Asia traders decide to stay out of the stock market

It’s been a roller-coaster ride for U.S. markets. Bloomberg’s Vildana Hajric breaks it down for #tictocnews.
As a turbulent December in equity markets draws to a close, there’s one idea traders and investors can agree on: these are not usual times, especially for this time of year.
It’s “completely bizarre,” says Stephen Innes, head of trading for Asia Pacific at Oanda Corp. “It’s incredible just how harmful markets veer when sentiment slides.”
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bloomberg the Company & Its ProductsBloomberg Anywhere Remote LoginBloomberg Terminal Demo Request Bloomberg Sign InSubscribe Home Markets Technology Politics Pursuits Opinion Businessweek Video Audio Newsletters Watchlist Subscribe Sign in Read New Economy Forum Wealth Crypto Checkout Hyperdrive Well Spent Prognosis Climate Changed Equality Good Business Billionaires Graphics Sponsored Content Watch The David Rubenstein Show Art + Technology Inspire GO Special Reports Where to Invest $10,000 50 Companies to Watch in 2018 What's Inside All the iPhones Read Economics Deals Fixed Income ETFs Benchmark Markets Magazine Watch Daybreak Surveillance Markets What'd You Miss Follow Twitter Facebook Data Stocks Currencies Commodities Rates & Bonds Sectors Economic Calendar Listen Trillions Odd Lots Surveillance Benchmark P&L Read Cybersecurity Startups AI Mobile Big Data Cloud Computing U.S. Global Special Reports The Elon Musk Tracker Tesla Model 3 Tracker Watch Gadgets with Gurman Digital Defense Bloomberg Technology TV Studio 1.0 Listen Decrypted Follow Twitter Facebook Read 2018 Women Candidates Trump Tracker Brexit Coverage World Leaders on the Brink 2018 Pessimist's Guide Listen Bloomberg Law Subscribe Balance of Power Follow Twitter Facebook Read Travel Autos Homes Living Culture Style Special Reports London Property Prices New York Property Prices How to Invest in Art How to Spend Your Bonus Watch Made Follow Twitter Facebook Instagram Read Editorials Follow Twitter Facebook Listen Masters in Business Subscribe Bloomberg Opinion Today Money Stuff Ritholtz's Reads Early Returns Sparklines Special Reports Sooner Than You Think The Year Ahead: 2018 The Bloomberg 50 Watch Hello World The Magazine Subscribe Follow Twitter Facebook Instagram Watch Live TV US Europe Asia Australia Schedule+Shows Shows Surveillance Daybreak Markets What'd You Miss? Bloomberg Technology All Shows... Series QuickTake Hello World The Spark Follow TicToc YouTube Twitter Facebook Bloomberg Radio Listen Live About Bloomberg Radio Podcasts Decrypted Odd Lots Trillions Benchmark Masters in Business Surveillance P&L Business of Sports Coast to Coast Bloomberg Law All Podcasts… Politics

SITE COUNT Amazing and shiny stats
Copyright © 2005-2021 Peter Burgess. All rights reserved. This material may only be used for limited low profit purposes: e.g. socio-enviro-economic performance analysis, education and training.