image missing
Date: 2024-07-17 Page is: DBtxt003.php txt00019462

Health
What is the best health system?

Socialized Medicine Is Bad for Your Health ... but not as bad as America's for profit private system !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Burgess COMMENTARY
Socialized Medicine Is Bad for Your Health ... but not as bad as America's for profit private system !!!!!!!!!!!!!! An immense amount of reform is needed in the USA. While some of the cuitting edge technology is amazing and the best in the world, most American's have to work with a poor, inefficient and costly system that simply does not work.
Peter Burgess
Socialized Medicine Is Bad for Your Health


(AJ Photo/Science Photo Library/Getty Images)

Imagine a shoe store with just one brand of sneakers; now apply that to medical care

Of all the forms of socialism that persist in the West, socialized medicine may well be the most persistent — and the most consequential.

But first, it’s worth defining exactly what “socialized medicine” is, and what it is not. “Universal coverage,” a system in which everyone has health insurance, is not necessarily socialized.

Switzerland, for example, has a system of universal coverage in which Swiss residents buy private insurance and receive treatment from private physicians and private hospitals. In contrast to the United States, there are no government-run insurers in Switzerland.

Canada, on the other hand, has socialized, or “single-payer,” health insurance, in which the government is the only meaningful health insurer. But Canadian-style socialized health insurance is still a minor-league version of socialized health care, because single-payer health insurance can — and frequently does — tolerate the existence of privately owned hospitals and physician clinics.

The standard-bearer of truly socialized medicine is the United Kingdom. In Britain, as in Canada, health insurance is the province of the government. But, as it is not in Canada, the delivery of health care is also socialized in Britain. That is, a government health-insurance agency pays a government-employed doctor to send Britons to government-owned hospitals.

The British National Health Service was conceived by William Beveridge, a fellow traveler of the Fabian Society, an influential group of British socialists who helped found the Labour party and the London School of Economics. During World War II, the wartime government invited Beveridge to chair a committee that would help plan the post-war British welfare state. His 1942 report to Parliament, Social Insurance and Allied Services, argued that “restoration of a sick person to health is a duty of the State . . . prior to any other consideration.” He proposed a “compulsory social insurance scheme without income limits” that would establish “a comprehensive national health service [to] ensure that for every citizen there is available whatever medical treatment he requires, in whatever form he requires it, . . . provided where needed without contribution conditions in any individual case.”

The British NHS is funded entirely by taxes, and is thereby “free” to patients at the point of care. There are no premiums, no co-pays, no deductibles. In theory, the economic result of such a system should resemble me at an open bar on a National Review cruise: excess consumption without respect to need or price. The NHS compensates for this problem in two principal ways: first, by centrally controlling the fees that doctors, hospitals, drug manufacturers, et al. receive for their goods and services; and second, by aggressively restricting the consumption of costly services that would otherwise blow up the British health-care budget.

The aggression and dictation have worked, in a sense. The NHS is kept on a strict budget and has not yet run out of other people’s money. In 2013, the United Kingdom subsidized health care to the tune of $3,057 per Briton; by comparison, American-government entities subsidized $4,207 of care per U.S. resident: 38 percent more.

But the NHS is no paradise. Open a random edition of a British daily newspaper and you will likely encounter an article about some egregious problem that the NHS has failed to solve. For example: NHS doctors routinely conceal from patients information about innovative new therapies that the NHS doesn’t pay for, so as not to “distress, upset or confuse” them; terminally ill patients are incorrectly classified as “close to death” so as to allow the withdrawal of expensive life support; NHS expert guidelines on the management of high cholesterol were intentionally not revised after becoming out of date, putting patients at serious risk in order to save money; when the government approved an innovative new treatment for blindness in elderly patients, the NHS initially decided to reimburse for the treatment only after patients were already blind in one eye — using the logic that a person blind in one eye can still see, and is therefore not that badly off; while most NHS patients expect to wait five months for a hip operation or knee surgery, leaving them immobile and disabled in the meantime, the actual waiting times are even worse: eleven months for hips and twelve months for knees (compared with a wait of three to four weeks for such procedures in the United States); one in four Britons with cancer is denied treatment with the latest drugs proven to extend life; those who seek to pay for such drugs on their own are expelled from the NHS system for making the government look bad, and are forced to pay for the entirety of their own care for the rest of their lives; and Britons diagnosed with cancer or heart attacks are more likely to die, and more quickly, than citizens of most other developed nations — Britain’s survival rates for these diseases are, according to an OECD survey, “little better than [those] of former Communist countries.”

One “success” of socialized medicine in Britain is that it has proven impervious to reform. In an attempt to reduce lengthy wait times for emergency-room service, Tony Blair’s Labour government introduced a mandate requiring that patients admitted to an NHS emergency room receive treatment within four hours. Some British hospitals responded by instructing their ambulances to drive around town with ailing patients inside, so as to minimize the number of patients technically waiting for care inside the emergency room. This year, the NHS announced plans to abandon the four-hour guarantee.

These problems — aggressive limitations on access to care, imperviousness to reform, dishonest statistics — will be familiar to those enrolled in America’s homegrown version of socialized medicine: the Veterans Health Administration. As with the NHS, delays and denials of treatment have long been endemic at the VA. In response, the VA installed performance metrics to ensure that veterans were treated without delays; VA hospitals responded by lying on official reports about wait times for treatment.

Understandably, American health-care socialists aren’t campaigning on “VA care for all.” Instead, their tagline is “Medicare for all,” in the hope that Medicare’s popularity with seniors can be manipulated to abolish private insurance altogether.

And it is true that the traditional Medicare program is a form of socialized, single-payer health insurance. Indeed, between Medicare, Medicaid, the VA, and other programs, more than 110 million Americans are enrolled in single-payer health insurance today.

It’s useful to compare and contrast Medicare with Canada’s single-payer system, which by coincidence is also called “Medicare.” Canadian Medicare, like the British NHS, makes health care “free” at the point of care, without co-pays or deductibles. Like the NHS, the Canadian system is infamous for its long waiting lists; a 2018 report from the Fraser Institute found that waiting times to see specialists have doubled in the last 25 years; on average, Canadians now wait 20 weeks to see a specialist physician after being referred by their general practitioner. Canadians have long waits not just for treatment but even for basic diagnostic technologies; the average wait time for an MRI scan is 10.6 weeks, and a month for an ultrasound or CT scan. (Wealthy Canadians, of course, have the luxury of being able to hop across the border for needed care, something that nearly all Britons lack.)

American Medicare works in a different way. When Medicare was being designed in 1965, the American Medical Association was concerned that it would lead to federal control over the practice of medicine. Lyndon Johnson, that crafty S.O.B., promised the AMA that if it at least remained neutral about his Medicare bill, he would allow doctors to charge their “usual, customary, and reasonable” rates — that is, whatever they wanted.

Both sides kept their promises, for the most part. American Medicare contains few restrictions on specialist care or expensive technologies. The American Medical Association and other doctors’ lobbies, through a secretive group called the “Specialty Society Relative Value Scale Update Committee,” effectively determine how taxpayers pay physicians for Medicare services.

These features of Medicare — heavily subsidized premiums and unlimited access — make the program highly popular with seniors. On average, seniors receive more than three dollars in benefits for every dollar they pay into Medicare.

But Medicare’s lack of Canadian- or British-style controls has turned the program into an oppressive fiscal burden. Today we spend more on Medicare than we spend on national defense. The program is the biggest driver of our deficits and debt. The Medicare hospital trust fund is already sending out more money than it takes in; according to its trustees, it will run out of other people’s money in 2026.

Advocates of so-called Medicare for All are, of course, being dishonest about its unaffordable $30 trillion price tag. But they are also being dishonest about the nature of today’s Medicare program. Of the 60 million Americans on Medicare, 22 million are enrolled in a market-based version of Medicare called “Medicare Advantage,” in which private insurers compete on price and value to enroll seniors in modernized health coverage, with better health outcomes, lower out-of-pocket costs, and broader benefits than Medicare’s single-payer version.

Since 2014, enrollment in traditional, single-payer Medicare has actually declined, from 38.4 million in that year to 38.2 million in 2019. But Medicare Advantage enrollment has soared, from 15.7 million in 2014 to 22.4 million today. “Medicare for All” would abolish these plans, literally ending Medicare as we know it.

Medicare Advantage has rapidly evolved in a way that traditional Medicare cannot, because private insurers tweak their benefits and features in real time, in response to consumer demand. Single-payer Medicare can do that only through acts of Congress and bureaucratic diktats.

Medicare Advantage highlights socialized medicine’s biggest lie: that “Medicare for All” expands Americans’ health-care “rights.” The Anglo-Canadian version of socialized medicine tramples on individuals’ rights to seek the care and coverage that they want. The U.S. version tramples on Americans’ right to the fruits of their own labor, conscripting them through taxes and debt to fund an unsustainable system.

Health care is indeed a right, in the same way that any use of liberty is a right. And that liberty — to freely seek the care we need, to pay for it in a way that is mutually convenient for us and our doctors, in a system that is sustainable for the generations to come — is one that we must not merely defend, but expand.



AVIK ROY — Mr. Roy, the president of the Foundation for Research on Equal Opportunity, is a former policy adviser to Mitt Romney, Rick Perry, and Marco Rubio.
------------------------------------
ALSO FROM AVIK ROY Pharmaceuticals and the Coronavirus Pandemic To Stop Socialized Medicine, Expand Individual Choice The Republican Party Needs Asian Voters How the Mainstream Media Creates Headaches for the Democrats How Badly Does Joe Biden Want to Win the Suburbs? U.S. Chamber of Commerce to Endorse a Record 30 House Democrats Kenosha Was a Wake-Up Call for Democratic Leaders across the Country Area Incumbent against Status Quo IN THIS ISSUE AGAINST SOCIALISM NATIONAL REVIEW Against Socialism: An Introduction By RICH LOWRY Socialism is back. POLITICS & POLICY Socialism Is Not Democratic By CHARLES C. W. COOKE Nor is it compatible with the Constitution. WORLD Socialism as Epic Tragedy By JOSHUA MURAVCHIK The idea millions killed and died for was a mirage. ECONOMY & BUSINESS Why Socialism Causes Shortages By JEFFREY TUCKER If you want to want, it’s the perfect system. POLITICS & POLICY Central Planners Cannot Know Enough By KEVIN D. WILLIAMSON Socialism and the ‘knowledge problem.’ WORLD Of Socialism and Human Nature By JOHN O'SULLIVAN Why the ideology fails — and succeeds. WORLD French Socialism Has Failed By PASCAL-EMMANUEL GOBRY ‘Free’ government services in France are unsustainable and anything but progressive. WORLD Britain’s Socialist Seventies By ANDREW STUTTAFORD Before Thatcher, there was stagnation and decline. ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT Socialism Is Bad for the Environment By SHAWN REGAN And markets are much better. HEALTH CARE Socialized Medicine Is Bad for Your Health By AVIK ROY Imagine a shoe store with just one brand of sneakers; now apply that to medical care. POLITICS & POLICY Socialism as Substitute Community By TIMOTHY P. CARNEY Alienated people are turning to Marx and Ocasio-Cortez. POLITICS & POLICY Socialism for the Young at Heart By DEIRDRE NANSEN MCCLOSKEY It becomes part of a cherished identity, hopefully not for long. CULTURE Socialism Destroys the Human Character By THEODORE DALRYMPLE If you see it up close, it’s no utopia. BOOKS, ARTS & MANNERS BOOKS Andrew Johnson’s Impeachment Lessons By ALLEN C. GUELZO A review of Impeachers: The Trial of Andrew Johnson and the Dream of a Just Nation, by Brenda Wineapple. BOOKS Ernie Banks’s Life of Sunshine and Shadows By JEREMY BEER A review of Let’s Play Two: The Legend of Mr. Cub, the Life of Ernie Banks, and Let’s Play Two: The Life and Times of Ernie Banks. BOOKS The Midwest’s Not-So-Hidden History By STEFAN BECK A review of The Heartland: An American History, 
by Kristin L. Hoganson. BOOKS Bukovsky’s Judgment By JAY NORDLINGER Jay Nordlinger talks with Vladimir Bukovsky, the onetime Soviet dissident, about a new-old book of his. CITY DESK The Cruelest Cough By RICHARD BROOKHISER Richard Brookhiser has a spring cold. FILM & TV Meeting Gorbachev: Werner Herzog’s Unexpected Documentary By ROSS DOUTHAT A review of the film Meeting Gorbachev. SECTIONS LETTERS Letters By NR EDITORS Readers write in on The Republic and baseball. THE WEEK The Week By NR EDITORS Don’t tear up your tickets just yet: We hear the Kentucky Derby loser is appealing to the Ninth Circuit. ATHWART Going Postal By JAMES LILEKS Bernie Sanders tweeted a hot new idea: ‘Did you know that from 1911-1967, Americans could bank at their local post office?’ THE LONG VIEW Racing Form — Belmont Stakes By ROB LONG A look at all the candidates, er, horses in the big upcoming race. POETRY Third Avenue By RICHARD O'CONNELL ‘Pushed by crowds against the glass of Alexander’s, where we stood...’ HAPPY WARRIOR Plato: The First Socialist By KYLE SMITH Socialism isn’t the new new thing. It’s the oldest of old things. TOP STORIES The Pollster Who Thinks Trump Is Winning in Wisconsin and Michigan JOHN MCCORMACK NR PLUS John Muir Is Canceled. Who’s Next? JOHN FUND Joe Biden: Please Spare Us the JPII Quotes until You Get with the Gospel of Life KATHRYN JEAN LOPEZ The American Economy Is Already Too Far Left for Comfort — or Prosperity MARTIN HUTCHINSON No One Wants to Solve Real Problems JIM GERAGHTY RECOMMENDED ARTICLES Biden’s Weak Stance on Rioters JIM GERAGHTY Stethoscope Socialism DEROY MURDOCK The Great Wait MICHAEL TANNER Why Americans Dislike Britain’s NHS AVIK ROY SPONSORED CONTENT Most wine drinkers in the US don't know these 5 simple Dos and Don'ts Most wine drinkers in the US don't know these 5 simple Dos and Don'ts NakedWines.com America's Policing Budget From 1977 To Now America's Policing Budget From 1977 To Now Bloomberg These Are Probably The Best Western Movies Ever Made. These Are Probably The Best Western Movies Ever Made. Investing.com Rich Celebs Who Don't Care About Fancy Rides Rich Celebs Who Don't Care About Fancy Rides Investing.com The King of Germany Will Accept Your Bank Deposits Now The King of Germany Will Accept Your Bank Deposits Now Bloomberg.com Recommended by [Photos] 35 People That Forgot to Check The Background Before Taking Photo [Photos] 35 People That Forgot to Check The Background Before Taking Photo History Chronicle [Photos] The Real Reason Linda Kozlowski Was Done After 'Crocodile Dundee' [Photos] The Real Reason Linda Kozlowski Was Done After 'Crocodile Dundee' The Primary Market What happens to all 2020 unsold cars, trucks and SUVs? What happens to all 2020 unsold cars, trucks and SUVs? Learn More Ageful The Most Disturbing Images Captured By Trail Cams Read More Daily Choices sponsored by Nerdwallet Should I refinance my private student loans? Nurse your med school loans toward a healthier rate Nurse your med school loans toward a healthier rate Learn More MBA loans holding you back? Find a better rate. MBA loans holding you back? Find a better rate. Learn More Jury’s out on your law school loans. Find a new rate. Jury’s out on your law school loans. Find a new rate. Learn More FROM OUR PARTNERS MOST POPULAR NR PLUS ELECTIONS Dangers for Democrats By MICHAEL BRENDAN DOUGHERTY Call me crazy, but I don’t think Joe Biden’s best response to the news of a leftist protestor shooting a peaceful Donald Trump supporter in the head execution-style is to run in front of the cameras and say, “This is Donald Trump’s America.” Or repeating the close of his news release the other day, ... Read More RELIGION You Can’t Be Pro-Life Unless You Oppose Abortion By KATHRYN JEAN LOPEZ Election times in non-pandemic years can bring out some of the best and the worst of America. Both parties, in their convention productions, were maybe a mix of both. The aspirational, inspirational moments are the best, which, of course, may be a bit too much of a promise about what electing one ticket to the ... Read More VIDEO China’s Monstrous Abuse of Uighur Women Is Evil National Review staff writer Madeleine Kearns addresses China's barbaric abuse of Uighur women, by weaponizing birth control and abortion. Read More ELECTIONS POLL: Biden Leads Trump Among Active Duty Troops By BRITTANY BERNSTEIN A recent Military Times poll shows President Trump losing support among active-duty service members, trailing Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden by nearly 4 percentage points. About 41 percent of active-duty troops expressed support for the former vice president while 37 percent said they supported ... Read More MEDIA Why Andrew Sullivan Isn’t at New York Magazine By RAMESH PONNURU I noted the parting of ways between writer and magazine here a few weeks ago. We now have some more clarity on the split, courtesy of a Ben Smith profile of Sullivan in the New York Times: The new editor of New York, David Haskell, didn’t push him out because of any new controversy or organized staff revolt, ... Read More ECONOMICS Apocalypse Now? By KEVIN D. WILLIAMSON Because ideas become ideologies and ideologies become cults, political narratives often are accompanied by apocalypse stories. For libertarians, the preferred apocalypse is hyperinflation, which is always right on the verge of happening but never actually happens. (Except when it does.) The world’s ... Read More U.S. Portland Shooter Declared Allegiance to Antifa, Was Previously Arrested for Bringing Gun to Protest By MAIREAD MCARDLE The man reportedly under investigation for the fatal shooting of a pro-Trump demonstrator during clashes in downtown Portland Saturday night declared his allegiance to Antifa on social media before the incident. Michael Forest Reinoehl, 48, described himself as an anti-fascist and posted photos on social ... Read More NR PLUS LAW & THE COURTS Does Kyle Rittenhouse Have a Self-Defense Claim? By ROBERT VERBRUGGEN Kenosha, a city of 100,000 in Wisconsin’s southeastern corner, now confronts the question of when lethal force is justified in two different cases. One, the shooting of Jacob Blake by a police officer, I addressed yesterday. The other is the case of Kyle Rittenhouse, who is alleged to have killed two people and ... Read More NR PLUS ECONOMICS Lies, Damned Lies, and Steve Rattner’s Statistics By ED CONARD As President Reagan once joked, “Well, the trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant; it's just that they know so much that isn't so.” In his New York Times op-ed, Steve Rattner adds his name to the list of people willing to compromise their reputation to mislead the American people. No ... Read More FISCAL POLICY Biden May Lose the Moderates By KEVIN A. HASSETT When Barack Obama and Joe Biden took over the White House in 2008, they had run on an ambitious agenda that included many of the same policies that Vice President Biden now advocates. President Obama threatened to withdraw from NAFTA, repeal the Bush tax cuts at the top, opposed secret-ballot union elections ... Read More VIEW MORE AROUND THE WEB If John Roberts Isn’t A Conservative, What Is He, Exactly? THE AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE In the fight for justice, moderation is a virtue THE WEEK America’s Jacobin Moment WALL STREET JOURNAL Camden’s Success Was Achieved by De-Unionizing, Not Defunding FOUNDATION FOR ECONOMIC EDUCATION SPONSORED STORIES Discover These 5 Little-Known Tech Stocks In 2020 InvestorPlace [Pics] School expels teen over outfit, regrets it when… Top 5 Man Who Predicted Trump's Win Makes Another Prediction Man Who Predicted Trump's Win Makes Another Prediction betterlyfe.news Recommended by FROM OUR PARTNERS LOGIN © 2020 National Review DONATE SUBSCRIBE Sections The Corner Capital Matters Bench Memos The Morning Jolt The G-File News Books, Arts & Manners All Articles All Authors Podcasts Photos Games Videos Topics Politics & Policy Culture White House Film & TV PC Culture U.S. World Immigration Economy & Business Elections Magazine Latest Issue Archive Subscribe Give NR as a Gift Customer Care NRPLUS About Frequently Asked Questions About Us The Masthead Contact Us Careers Privacy Policy Terms of Service NR Institute More Advertise Donate Search E-mails & Alerts Send a Tip Newsletters Morning Jolt (M-F) NR Daily (M-Sa) Breaking News (M-Su) Email Loading... You have 3 free articles remaining. Subscribe now to unlock all premium content, website commenting tools, and more. Already have an account? Login SUBSCRIBE NOW Close Rollup < Paused by McAfee® Web Boost
SITE COUNT Amazing and shiny stats
Copyright © 2005-2021 Peter Burgess. All rights reserved. This material may only be used for limited low profit purposes: e.g. socio-enviro-economic performance analysis, education and training.