image missing
Date: 2025-01-04 Page is: DBtxt003.php txt00027594
USA
VIEWS OF BOB WOODWARD

NPR ... All Things Considered : Bob Woodward on Trump, Harris, and war in Ukraine


Original article: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pHi4SB0QoCo
Peter Burgess COMMENTARY

Peter Burgess
Bob Woodward on Trump, Harris, and war in Ukraine | All Things Considered | NPR

NPR

Oct 15, 2024

525K subscribers ... 176,471 views ... 4.8K likes

NPR is an American public broadcast service. Wikipedia

Legendary journalist Bob Woodward’s new book 'War' — like so many of his books about the American presidency over the last half century — is generating headlines. Woodward sat down with All Things Considered host Scott Detrow to discuss the headline-grabbing moments documented in the book.

• Read or listen to: 'Bob Woodward takes NPR behind the headline-grabbing moments in his new book' at https://www.npr.org/2024/10/14/nx-s1-...

Follow NPR elsewhere, too:
  • • Instagram: / npr
  • • TikTok: / npr
  • • Facebook: / npr
Transcript
  • 0:02
  • Bob Woodward welcome to all things considered thank you I wanted to start with the war in Ukraine actually uh
  • because you write in incredible detail about how the Biden Administration dealt
  • with that war before Russia invaded in the early months of the war and the
  • proactive steps that President Biden and the administration took to De declassify
  • intelligence and to confront Russia in public what was the main goal of taking
  • those steps of of standing there in the White House briefing room and saying we know you're going to do this they wanted
  • to stop it of course but what's U very significant in terms of foreign policy
  • momentum uh and I write about this in the book The intelligence is so good I
  • mean at one point they have a human Source in the Kremlin uh the electronic
  • and other intell so they are as I write it's like being

  • 1:04
  • in the enemy tent and this this unfolds with much less Ambu ambiguity than
  • normally you see the the working out you know is somebody going to start a war
  • MH and we knew from public statements from President Biden from National
  • Security adviser Jake suvin and others that there were deep concerns about the threat of nuclear weapons but in the
  • book you describe detailed meetings where where the bid Administration is
  • taking this incredibly seriously they're very concerned how real was the threat of nuclear weapons in the fall of 2022
  • well it becomes very Vivid because of the intelligence and because of the assessment it's 50% a coin flip as one
  • of Biden's AIDS says and the idea and the the worry is so deep oh my God we're

  • 2:05
  • going to have nuclear use in the Biden presidency which is the last thing or
  • one of the last things he wants and so they're all over it and being in the
  • enemy tent they're trying to stop it realizing to a certain extent uh all the
  • intelligence all the assessments they have Putin Putin is just obsessed with
  • Ukraine it belongs to Russia and uh he writes some things publicly and there it
  • it is not a borderline decision for him it is this is ours we're going to just
  • take it reclaiming the Russian Empire this is something we're going to do and despite those uh those
  • direct pleas threats urging not to do this the war begins and at a certain

  • 3:03
  • point when Russia's on its heels uh like you said the intelligence says that it's it's a coin flip moment of whether or
  • not Russia is going to use nuclear weapons can you walk us through some of the reporting that you've gathered of
  • the direct phone calls from the Secretary of Defense and others to their counterparts in Russia saying don't do
  • this yeah I mean the most Vivid one is uh Secretary of Defense Austin there is
  • a i have a literal transcript of what he said this is October 21st
  • 2022 and they have this very Vivid Rock Solid intelligence and so Secretary of
  • Defense Lloyd Austin they agree in the NSC let's call your counterpart uh Serge
  • Shu and so this I have a literal transcript and if you'll permit me to

  • 4:02
  • read some of it because it makes the knowledge that they have real and it
  • makes how how they're dealing with this crisis uh first Austin says to shogo we
  • we know you are contemplating the use of tactical nucle weapons in
  • Ukraine first any use of nuclear weapons
  • on any scale against anybody would be seen by the United States in the world
  • as a world changing event there is no scale of nuclear weapons use that we
  • could Overlook or that the world could Overlook other words he he not it's just
  • hey what's going on it's we know and uh
  • it it's very there's a kind of um analytical sophistication here you you

  • 5:07
  • kind of wonder what really happens in these calls and so here it goes on and
  • Shu says if you did this all the restraints that we have been operating
  • under in Ukraine would be reconsidered Austin said and quote uh
  • the this would isolate Russia on the world stage to a degree you Russians
  • cannot fully appreciate Shu says quote I don't like
  • kindly to being threatened Austin says I think in one of
  • the blondest kind of uh open interchanges I've ever learned the
  • details of at this high level Mr Minister Austin said I am the leader of

  • 6:01
  • the most powerful military in the history of the world I don't make
  • threats did you get a sense of what the response could have been because at the
  • same time uh you you report President Biden saying in meetings the United
  • States would not respond with nuclear weapons but on the other stand that is a very clear statement from from secretary
  • Austin in that phone call yes I mean that's the where they're talking I have
  • some of the things that Biden said privately um but here here's what the
  • Russians have to deal with this kind of uh threat open
  • threat and it's interesting because at the same point this is a real concern you have phone calls like that you have
  • public warnings you have another round of strategic uh declassification of of
  • intelligence about the false flag of of a Ukrainian dirty bomb that that Russia

  • 7:03
  • is talking about as as kind of a pretext to maybe use these weapons and the administration goes out and says they're
  • trying to do this and and warns them and then at the same time over the last couple of years you
  • have President Biden and the officials that you're reporting
  • on become almost less concerned with the red lines that they were worried about you know they go from giving Javelin
  • missiles to Ukraine to giving f-16s to Ukraine to now the conversation is americanmade missil striking within
  • Russia and I don't know it seems to me that those are almost two things in conflict with each other they were concerned about the real use of nuclear
  • weapons and also they seemed to be thinking that the red lines that Russia kept laying down weren't necessarily the
  • case how did those conversations shift well it's a reflection of the way Biden
  • works and he he wants to make deals he wants to smooth the waters if possible

  • 8:00
  • here and so he he enters in uh but you
  • know this is a this is a if you I I've spent too much of my life doing National
  • Security reporter reporting the issue of nuclear weapons is kind of like uh it is
  • the silent Shadow as I call it over all of this and anyone in that world
  • decisionmaking world knows that it's Central to prevent that and stop it and
  • not take just the United States or Russia but the world this becomes a
  • world changing issue is discussed here and so uh they pull out all the stops
  • but there is always the contradiction of
  • Joe Biden ah let's make let's work it out let's let's uh not have a

  • 9:04
  • confrontation with a very direct conf confrontational approach uh as is
  • outlined in this call I was very surprised to see that was so in their
  • face you were surprised at how serious the threat was or the direct way that
  • the administration responded to the threat both both yeah I mean this is this is any you you look at it and this
  • is potentially historic and their goal is to make it not historic I
  • mean as you said you've been covering National Security for a while now you've been covering administrations from the
  • Nixon Administration on was this the most serious nuclear threat that you've reported on yes uh because they're
  • talking about it and in dealing with Ukraine and uh the way Putin looks at

  • 10:07
  • this in the doctrine of we can't have a
  • catastrophic Battlefield loss that we have to if we confront that Doctrine and
  • it lays it out in the book and their private calls between the generals on this uh in that
  • situation uh we we are dancing in history in a in a way and and
  • they know it and at the same time about halfway through the book there's an entire other war that breaks
  • out and it's a war that has consumed the headlines um from October 7th of last
  • year on and uh there are so many details about how the Biden White House is
  • trying to make sense of what's happening and of trying again and again and again to restrain Israel's response uh a lot

  • 11:03
  • there's a lot of focus of the first few weeks of the War uh especially immediately leading up to President
  • Biden's unprecedented visit to Israel wartime visit to Israel to meet with prime minister Netanyahu and his cabinet
  • can you talk to us about what the White House was trying to get Israel to hold back on and the way that Secretary of
  • State blinkin and others leveraged that Biden visit to try and urge some some restraint well it it starts before that
  • 4 days uh after October 7th which is just a
  • Monumental event uh moment in history uh
  • on by October 11th what prime minister Netanyahu wants to do is launch a
  • preemptive strike on his Bala I don't think this was really known at the time
  • was there much in the Daily Press I I don't think so but uh this was what

  • 12:03
  • Netanyahu wanted to do and we show in
  • October 11th and and this is uh Netanyahu at his most hey we're going to
  • solve this problem preemptive strike Biden and the White House and the
  • National Security team this is the last thing they want and I have the direct
  • dialogue the persuasive efforts uh no you can't do this don't do this it won't
  • work and uh netanyahu's very much
  • Netanyahu I'm going to make my own decision yeah and I'll take uh into my
  • advice what you say but I decide and I I
  • thought it was one of those moment moments where you realize and Biden and the White House

  • 13:05
  • and the National Security team realizes they have some influence but very
  • limited influence and Netanyahu marches to his own drummer I think the book
  • shows that vividly I'm curious what you thought because you write this book
  • laying out all of this detail of of the Biden Administration trying to hold
  • Israel back from a preemptive strike into Lebanon specifically and and you imagine I mean
  • what that would have been like but there's an element of that playing out right now or was would that have been
  • much broader than what we're seeing because as the book is about to to come to Market you have you have uh
  • incursions into Lebanon you have direct strikes onto bayroot it it seems like that AV verion of that at least has
  • taken place would this have been much broader uh it certainly could have been I I mean we we know when Netanyahu makes

  • 14:02
  • a decision uh what is he quoted saying if in the Middle East you're weak you're
  • roadkill yeah that is absolutely true in the early weeks of the war President
  • Biden flies to Israel to stand with Benjamin Netanyahu much later in the book you
  • have very colorful quotations of President Biden using all sorts of curse words to talk about Netanyahu were you
  • able to pinpoint a clear breaking point or was it a serious of events well it it's an attitude I mean you know again
  • these are the private comments normally we don't get or we get in a memoir 20
  • years from now where the president um sees uh
  • Netanyahu as he says to AIDS a liar a blanking liar uh even at one point says
  • privately to his AIDS uh that uh

  • 15:01
  • Netanyahu is a liar and 18 of the 19 people who work for him are liars so
  • this reflects the policy and the policy that Biden laid out uh I I think is
  • important and that is it's pro-israel but not at all
  • necessarily pro- Netanyahu what was president Harris's role in all of these big National
  • Security conversations these key moments that that we're talking about the beginning of the Ukraine war the Russian
  • nuclear threat the early days of the Israel Hamas War she's going to president school that's what vice
  • presidents do and she as best I can tell she's
  • at almost all of the meetings she gets involved uh and at one point they're
  • trying to when they're uh actually respond to in in within the

  • 16:07
  • NSC they're discussing uh what to do when uh Israel has really kind of pushed
  • back Iran I mean not kind of but really
  • eliminated the strike of massive numbers of ballistic missiles MH
  • and they're in the NSC and Biden I I think she's remote on
  • the screen and uh he says you know what what
  • what should we do and and she's the one who says take the win yeah take the win
  • and Biden goes through his response and literally says take the win to Netanyahu
  • that's his theme stop the momentum of this catastrophe

  • 17:03
  • and that did lead to a slight cooling of of the ramping up of tension
  • between Israel and Iran at least in that particular moment after that first wave of of air strikes on Israel yeah exactly
  • but everything is a particular moment yeah there's no uh and that's what's uh
  • nice to be able to work on the long form in a book and you can see the steps and
  • uh be and in many many cases the exact
  • language former president Trump is a figure throughout this book you trace
  • his his presidency in Exile and the way that he starts to regain momentum and
  • reestablish himself on the national stage and and run for president again uh
  • you not only quote people like um former uh joint Chief chairman Mark Melly

  • 18:00
  • expressing grave concerns you at the end weigh in with your own grave concerns about a possible second Trump
  • Administration yeah what uh General Millie so I think this is in March 2023
  • so it's last year not that long ago um Millie says in a interview that uh Trump
  • is the most dangerous uh and uh
  • really is gets to the point where he says to me
  • you have to do something about this we have to do something about this now
  • remember Millie's the sitting chairman of the Joint Chiefs
  • talking about the president of the United States it is so he is so
  • distressed about Trump's what he's doing I mean I my

  • 19:03
  • conclusion and I think it shows it in the book uh is that Trump doesn't really
  • understand the presidency does not understand uh it's full obligations and
  • opportunities and he continually misses the boat and the scenes later with his
  • big supporter Lindsey Graham the South Carolina Republican senator who tries
  • to talk Trump off the ledge if you will and at one point says to him you know uh
  • the people who think the Earth is flat uh the the people who think we didn't go
  • to the Moon you you've got those people you need to and and Trump keeps talking
  • and and the I think what's disorienting even to Trump's own

  • 20:02
  • supporters is this idea that he really
  • won in 2020 and he can't get away from that and
  • Lindsey Graham supporter friend uh says you know don't don't keep going back to
  • 2020 people in the Republican Party want to win and
  • uh talking about 2020 uh that's over that's settled by the courts it's
  • settled by the reality of Joe Biden sitting uh in the White House and and
  • Trump is still talking about this obsessively and uh even at one point
  • calls Graham and and says oh he's really proud of himself said I only brought up
  • 2020 twice at a recent rally your speech

  • 21:00
  • with Ukraine specifically there are so many moments that you document where it could have
  • gone either way it could have expanded into a much more serious confrontation that Drew in other countries there could
  • have been a nuclear exchange any sense from the conversations you were having from the
  • interviews you were doing how the Ukraine war would have played out differently had Donald Trump been in the White House I quote Jake Sullivan uh the
  • national security adviser for Biden saying that uh if Trump had been
  • president U Putin would be in keave now
  • why because Trump who loves
  • dictators a and um the unity of power in
  • one person would have um waved Putin right into ke would have
  • been no uh push back why and this is what

  • 22:04
  • Trump says or this is what Jake Sullivan says which uh has a lot of Truth uh
  • Trump loves dictators it's almost like there are almost like two Joe bidens in this book
  • there is a Joe Biden decisively making calls in in uh you know the situation
  • room in the Oval Office uh trying to trying to bring along this NATO
  • Coalition and there is the Joe Biden who as you report more than a year before
  • that that fateful presidential debate uh donors had deep concerns about about his
  • uh his appearance at fundraisers evening fundraisers where he seemed to go off script and ramble not be able to
  • complete a thought did you get any indication during your reporting of all of the challenges that Biden was having
  • particularly over the last year when it came to the age issue I mean I reported

  • 23:00
  • in the book but it was not I'm doing the book and it's they're a number of
  • references to this but there was no evidence I had that it was so alarming
  • that as I have many times gone to my bosses at the Washington Post and said
  • I'm working on a book but I have something that should be in the newspaper tomorrow yeah uh nothing like
  • but I guess were you given the conversations you were having and the interviews you were doing
  • were you surprised by how he carried himself in that debate because it's a very different president in these
  • meetings and I mean this has been reported in so many different places the momentto moment nature of it but Joe Biden can again get in a plane and and
  • and fly into wartime Israel and then have a debate where he couldn't complete a thought yes um I've written about 10
  • presidents going back to uh Nixon

  • 24:01
  • and I almost reached the conclusion in nor in in order
  • to I've I've written about 10 presidents going back to Nixon that's a long time
  • ago and have got to known some of to know some of them U personally and in a
  • way to be president you have to to be two or three or four people you have to
  • live with the contradictions of this very important
  • decision making and um the ones that work the best I think are presidents who
  • are driven by evidence and not ideology
  • or not hey this is the way we're going to do this but we're going to we're going to be flexible

  • 25:00
  • so I'd give I give um me at the end as you may note in the in the book I give
  • Biden a great deal of credit for steady
  • leadership and not sending US troops to fight in these wars you did it's in an
  • epilogue you kind of like you said give your conclusion to all that i' I've read just about all of your books and I
  • didn't remember you weighing in in that way before no uh that's quite correct I
  • I tried to but this was so clear and
  • Maybe not maybe I definitely am getting older and as I go around and what do you
  • think what's your concl you know in the the reportorial curtain comes down oh I'm
  • just a reporter I'm just a reporter uh I think in this case because
  • uh I was able to get enough detail about the

  • 26:04
  • sequences that it was almost an obligation to tell people yeah this is
  • this is what I think yeah Washington politics has changed so much since you started writing about presidents has
  • that changed the way that you report these books no I mean the way to report the
  • book is to report the book and keep calling people keep doing it keep going
  • back keep trying to uh make sure you give people an
  • opportunity and to State their experience and get notes and documents
  • and take readers as close as possible to to not just the language but the
  • emotions that are emitted in these debates do you think it's changed the

  • 27:00
  • way people read these books or changed the effect of the books on the political scene that's a big question I don't
  • know because we just seem to be in a world where very few New Revelations
  • seem to affect the political consensus well that's that's yeah that's fine but
  • I no I think they do I mean there in this book is the information that was
  • not known about Trump sending the covid testing machines not just the tests but
  • the machines to Putin and the discussion he has with Putin about this and Putin
  • says you know don't tell anyone and um Trump oh I don't care Putin says no
  • don't tell anyone because I he's looking out this is an alliance and of course
  • what do they do cover it up yeah and which it
  • me I noticed this morning uh vice president Harris was picked up on this

  • 28:05
  • and you could just see her emotions about here we are in this
  • epidemic and the president of the United States is taking expensive
  • coveted testing machines and sending them to Putin and Russians and then they
  • cover it up they agree let you know as is always said the cover up is often
  • worse than the crime and she you know it's it's a political point she's trying
  • to make but I I saw there was a kind of emotional
  • connection that she was to expain about you know what what
  • is the process what is the hierarchy of what I

  • 29:03
  • care about evident in that the last thing I want to ask is something um we
  • went back and and looked at something you you told my colleague Mary louiz Kelly when your book rage came out in 20120 and you said that that sometimes
  • you almost question what keeps drawing you back into writing another one of these books how are you thinking about
  • that now are you thinking about hey there's a new president coming in either way I better get back to work or what's
  • your thought process on what you do next uh well I'm 81 and every day I learn
  • that I'm not 37 uh it's different and uh but these th
  • this is a immensely consequential moment and the
  • moment for the United States is this election and vice president Harris

  • 30:01
  • uh and there's a scene in this book where it's President Biden saying you know uh maybe he
  • Biden would be have the best chance of defeating Trump and so she's she's
  • inexperienced there's no question about that and so voters I mean
  • that's as you know reporters you are inevitably trying to
  • figure out what's in people's minds I mean collectively you know what's the
  • what are people sitting at home watching all of this debate
  • convulsion unpleasantry in in American politics
  • what are they thinking I and I don't know I think I think it's very confusing
  • time for people so what's the old

  • 31:01
  • rule report yeah and then report a little bit more a little bit more if you
  • can solves a lot of those problems when you're trying to figure out what exactly is people are thinking or saying or
  • what's going to happen next that's that's journalist Bob Woodward his latest book out today is war thank you
  • so much for coming in thank you


SITE COUNT Amazing and shiny stats
Copyright © 2005-2021 Peter Burgess. All rights reserved. This material may only be used for limited low profit purposes: e.g. socio-enviro-economic performance analysis, education and training.