OVERVIEW
MANAGEMENT
PERFORMANCE
POSSIBILITIES
CAPITALS
ACTIVITIES
ACTORS
BURGESS
|
Investment
Sustainable Investment / ESG Loose ESG definition impacts passives ASSET CLASS IN FOCUS ... By Kate Lin, 
Taie Wang, State Street Global Advisors https://fundselectorasia.com/elusive-esg-definition-impacts-passives/ Peter Burgess COMMENTARY ... added February 2024 I have been aggravated by the growing adoption of ESG as a management modality for sustainable investment over the last few years. Worse, ESG talk is being applied to essentially most investment. The ESG idea seems to me to be fatally flawed because it avoids what has been the most important dimension of investment decision making ever ... the profit that can be made with the investment! Where is profit and return on investment in the ESG metrcis? This cannot be 'by chance'! Rather it seems to me is an attempt by the rich and powerful in the economy to 'con' the rest of us into thinking that they are serious about issues like society and the environment when the reality it is all about their own accumulation and retention of wealth, power and influence. There have been a number of 'gilded ages' when society was divided by massive wealth inequity but the state of society during the past 40 years has not been described in this way, even though the concentration of wealth has become more pronounced now than perhaps at any time in the past ... or is it? I see the ESG conversation as being nothing more than a diversionary tactic to keep the conversation away from the chronic level of inequality both within rich societies and also between rich societies and all the others! What is the reason that the idea of the Triple Bottom Line (TBL) promulgated in the 1990s by John Elkington and quite well publicised never got widely adopted? The only reason that seems to make sense is that those with power and influence understood that it was going to change things, and one of the things that would be changed were the fantastic levels of profit that were starting to emerge as a result of more powerful technology that could improve productivity significantly. By keeping all the productivity gains driving profit wealth accumulation would accrue to investors and mostly it would be the environment and the rest of society that lost out. For the rich and powerful, caring for the rest of us is not, and never has been, a priority so why should any of us be surprised.! Peter Burgess | ||
|
ASSET CLASS IN FOCUS ... Loose ESG definition impacts passives
Written by Kate Lin ... State Street Global Advisors research for global equity beta solutions at State Street Global Advisor Asia. Written y DREW WILSON 1st AUGUST 2018 Wider adoption of responsible investing principles is unlikely to send investors crowding into the same high quality assets because ESG is not standardised, according to Taie Wang, deputy head of research for global equity beta solutions at State Street Global Advisor Asia. Fund managers do not have a standardised approach to selection of responsible investments, leading to different investible universes, Wang said. Therefore, overcrowding into the same assets seems unlikely. The loose definition of ESG also has an impact on passive products, she said. Index-tracking products that have been created using ESG criteria can drift away from the index they are intended to track, impacting performance. “For traditional cap-weighted passive products, the objective is to replicate a designated benchmark with a minimal tracking error. With such a [cap-weighted] product nature, there is not much you can do with ESG principles.” A manager of an ESG-focused ETF intending to track a cap weighted index may find ESG scoring is low among some of the top weighted companies. Therefore, weighting would have to be adjusted to address the ESG scoring, increasing tracking error. Globally, there are about 270 sustainable index funds and exchange-traded funds with an aggregate assets of $102bn, according to Morningstar data. Wang believes smart beta products are more effective when applying ESG principles than cap-weighted passive products. She cited an example of constructing a smart beta product emphasizing the quality factor. “Some research finds that ESG and the quality factor have a high correlation to each other. But adding ESG considerations into a factor investing portfolio may bring exposure to the non-financial aspects of a quality company.” However, not all companies with solid ESG profiles are a good fit for all types of factor investing, she said. In momentum strategies, large cap companies with the best ESG scores typically lack momentum, for example. Muddled ESG Investors are often confused by ESG investing because it has no universal definition or standard methodology. Gerard Lee, CEO of Singapore’s Lion Global Investors, told FSA that ESG investing is usually understood to be synonymous with corporate governance. Wang added that it can therefore be a challenge explaining ESG to investors. “It is easy to understand the aspects of environment, social and governance, but different people may have different interpretation and measurement for each pillar of ESG,” she said. “For the same company, the results of their ESG scoring can vary massively among the data vendors in the market.” Asia ESG funds In Hong Kong and Singapore, there are relatively few funds with an ESG/sustainable investment focus. Among all actively-managed funds authorised for sale in Hong Kong and Singapore, 111 products with a sustainable focus are available — about 2% of the total universe, according to FE data. In terms of passive products, nine ETFs with an ethical/sustainable investment focus are authorised by Singapore’s regulator for sale to professional investors, plus one for sale to retail investors, the CIMB S&P Ethical Asia Pacific Dividend ETF. Hong Kong, however, does not have any registered for sale.
| The text being discussed is available at | https://fundselectorasia.com/elusive-esg-definition-impacts-passives/ and |